Monday, November 25, 2013

Crimes Which Require Automatic Mandatory Periods of Driver’s License Suspension.

Prepared as a Public Service to the People from the Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq.

Persons convicted of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2b (Eluding); Theft or unlawful taking of a Motor Vehicle (N.J.S.A. 2C:20-2.1), require that the court impose a period of mandatory driving license suspension privilege in this state.

Anyone considering taking a plea for these offenses must insure that they understand that their New Jersey driving license privileges will be suspended.  Therefore, if someone is charged with these offenses it is important that the criminal defense attorney handling the matter attempt to resolve the matter so as not to trigger the automatic license suspension.

Many people have plead guilty to these offenses without being advised by their attorney of the automatic mandatory license suspension.  If you have been a victim of such faulty legal advice you are advised to consult the Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., to see whether you might have a post-conviction relief motion to regarding this issue.  Also, many judges have imposed mandatory driving license suspension on people convicted of receiving stolen property (motor vehicle), in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-7 which does not require mandatory license suspension.  If you have been a victim to such an illegal sentence you likewise must seek legal representation to rectify that sentence and seek to have your driving privileges restored.

Many Superior Court Judges in Essex County have mistakenly suspended driving privileges based on N.J.S.A. 2C:20-7, which is illegal, and recently the Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., was successful in correcting one illegal sentence and restoring a driver’s license for a client in which the court had imposed a twenty-year driver’s license suspension.

Monday, November 18, 2013

How to Cross-Examine the Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS) Expert for the Prosecution.

This Blog was written and published for the People by the Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr.

Often in an alleged sexual assault case of a minor the State prosecutor will offer a CSAAS expert (Child Sexual Abuse Accomodation Syndrome witness) who will testify that the child’s delayed reporting of the abuse is normal in children.  They will use this testimony not only to explain why the delayed reporting is common, but more deceitfully to falsely plant the seed with the jury with the idea that in fact the child is actually telling the truth because he or she delayed in said reporting.
One form of effective cross-examination goes like this.

1.   So, doctor, you’re not saying the child is necessarily telling the truth, correct?
2.   Or that this incident actually happened?
3.   Sometimes children delay in reporting sexual abuse because it never happened, correct?
4.   And other times the delay reporting happens at some future time, due to family influences or the stories of other children, and they make up the claims, correct?
5.   The fact that the child’s allegation came so much later in no way enhances the child’s credibility, correct?

Note, any real cross would be much better structured and somewhat longer, but only somewhat longer. Get in, quickly make your point, and get out. The brevity of the cross implies to the jury your outright dismissal, almost contempt, of the weight of such testimony, and the doctor has said that the child is not necessarily telling the truth, and that some children make up stories. Their expert says that. The jury instruction helps cement the point. Incorporate the language used in the charge into your questions to make it seem to the jury that the judge agrees with you by using the same words in his final charge and the same cautionary instructions.  
Lastly, it is important that you read the jury charge first. It offers a wealth of topics for cross-examination, and with just a few questions you can turn that witness into your best summation argument. You do not want to undermine the witness.  Most importantly you want to use his/her credentials to prove your point.

P.O. Box 261
277 North Broad Street
Elizabeth, N.J. 07207
Office:   (908) 354-7006
Cell:     (201) 240-5716
Dated: November 18, 2013

Criminal Lawyers Jersey City, Criminal Lawyers Elizabeth NJ, Criminal Lawyers Newark, Criminal Lawyers Bayonne, Criminal Lawyers Plainfield, Criminal Lawyers Union City, NJ, Criminal Lawyers Bergen County, Criminal Lawyers Bergen County, Criminal Lawyers Union County NJ, Criminal Lawyers Essex County, Criminal Lawyers Irvington, Criminal Lawyers New Brunswick